By taking the vantage point of agonistic pluralism, the aim is to enter into dialogue with Samuelsson’s theoretical development of consensus as an educational aim for classroom discussions. The response highlights three points of interest in the deliberative conception of consensus. The first point relates to the problem of exclusion, which Samuelsson clearly framed as something that concerns deliberative theory and agonistic theory. The second point is about the relation between conflict and consensus and the kind of conflict that is compatible with Samuelsson’s idea of consensus. The concluding part of this response is an exploration of how the agonistic concept of hegemony could function as an alternative aim for ending classroom discussions.
Response to Article
Martin Samuelsson, Education for Deliberative Democracy and the Aim of Consensus
How to End a Discussion: Consensus or Hegemony? A Response to "Education for Deliberative Democracy and the Aim of Consensus".
Democracy and Education,
(2), Article 5.
Available at: https://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol27/iss2/5