“I Didn’t See It as a Cultural Thing”: Supervisors of Student Teachers Define and Describe Culturally Responsive Supervision

Authors

Linda B. Griffin, Lewis & Clark CollegeFollow
Dyan Watson, Lewis & Clark CollegeFollow
Tonda Liggett, Marylhurst UniversityFollow

Abstract

Student teaching supervisors can play an integral role in teacher candidates’ ability to understand and enact culturally responsive pedagogy (CRP). However, supervisors may lack the awareness, knowledge, skill, or willingness to serve as culturally responsive supervisors. This paper reports the findings from a qualitative study to find out how supervisors described and supported CRP. We found that supervisors hold unsophisticated views of CRP and face the following challenges enacting culturally responsive supervision: feelings of inadequacy, difficulty talking about race, color-blind orientations, and a tendency to purposefully avoid race talk. We provide recommendations for professional development to address these challenges and narrow the theory-to-practice divide in order to promote the democratic education ideals of equality and justice in our schools.

Response to this Article

Maria Dantas-Whitney and R. Dana Ulveland, Problematizing Assumptions, Examining Dilemmas, and Exploring Promising Possibilities in Culturally Relevant Pedagogy

Recommended Citation

Griffin, L. B. , Watson, D. , Liggett, T. (2016). “I Didn’t See It as a Cultural Thing”: Supervisors of Student Teachers Define and Describe Culturally Responsive Supervision. Democracy and Education, 24 (1), Article 3.
Available at: https://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol24/iss1/3